Although universities differ in how
they deal with student plagiarism, there are also 'clusters of consensus’. This
is the finding of the second phase of the Academic Misconduct Benchmarking
Research Project (AMBeR) conducted by the UK's Academy JISC Academic Integrity
Service (AJAIS). The report found that while all universities manage the issue
of student plagiarism on an individual basis, the most common ways of dealing
with the issue were the resubmission of assessments, where the resulting mark
would be capped and a formal warning given. Over 50 per cent of the recorded
instances of plagiarism were dealt with in one of these ways. The report also
indicated that the vast majority of offences are first offences which suggests
that current measures being taken are successfully reducing repeat offenders.
Tennant, P., Rowell, G.,
& Duggan, F. (2007). Academic misconduct benchmarking research project:
Part I. United Kingdom: Amber Project. https://www.plagiarism.org/assets/Tennant_amber1.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment