A survey of education studies shows students tend to absorb more on paper than on screen, though the benefits are minor. The studies showed that students of all ages, from elementary school to
college, tend to absorb more when they’re reading on paper than on
screens, particularly when it comes to nonfiction material. This finding is now at least the third study to
synthesize reputable research on reading comprehension in the digital
age and find that paper is better. It was preceded by a 2017 review by scholars at the University of Maryland and a 2018 meta-analysis
by scholars in Spain and Israel. The international analysis arrived at
nearly the same numerical conclusion as the other study. Paper beat
screens by more than a fifth of a standard deviation.
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
Clinton, V. (2019). Reading from paper compared to screens. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(2), 288-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12269
No comments:
Post a Comment