Showing posts with label education technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label education technology. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 25, 2018

Literacy and Students with Disabilities


As library workers, we want all students to be literate: to be able to find, select, evaluate, use, communicate, manage, and create information. For various reasons, students with disabilities have more difficulties gaining literacy. Their senses may filter or distort incoming information, their brains may process information in different ways, and their bodies may have difficult expressing their knowledge. As information professionals, we should provide physical and digital resources, including equipment, that help compensate for these differences. Here is representative research about literacy from the lens of disabilities. Among the findings, inclusive literacy and oral fluency stand out.

Cassell, J. (2008). Virtual humans: A tool for the study and teaching of language and social interaction. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting, Boston.
http://articulab.northwestern.edu/
Virtual characters and digital tutors are helping children and adults develop advanced social and language skills that can be tough to learn via conventional approaches. Children with autism can develop advanced social skills by interacting with a "virtual child" that they might not develop by hanging out with real children or teachers.

Davidson, M. M., Kaushanskaya, M., & Weismer, S. E. (2018). Reading Comprehension in Children With and Without ASD: The Role of Word Reading, Oral Language, and Working Memory. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 1-18.
For students with Autism Spectum Disorder, oral vocabulary was the strongest predictor of reading comprehension.

Flewitt, R., Messer, D., & Kucirkova, N. (2015). New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 15(3), 289-310.
Well-planned iPad-based literacy activities stimulate the motivation and concentration of children with disabilities. They also offered rich opportunities for communication, collaborative interaction, independent learning, and for children to achieve high levels of accomplishment. In some cases, this led teachers favorably to re-evaluate the children’s literacy competence, and enabled children to construct positive images of themselves in the literacy classroom. Practitioners particularly valued the opportunities iPads afforded to deliver curriculum guidelines in new ways, and to familiarize all students with touch-screen technologies.

Hebbeler, K., & Spiker, D. (2016). Supporting young children with disabilities. The Future of Children, 185-205.
High-quality instruction in general education classrooms is a major factor in good educational outcomes for children with disabilities, and for their successful inclusion from preschool to third grade. Moreover,
improving the quality of general education benefits all children, not just those with disabilities.

Hulme, C., Nash, H. M., Gooch, D., LervÄg, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2015). The foundations of literacy development in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1877-1886.
Reading development depends critically on oral language skills, which is lacking in children at familial risk of dyslexia. Therefore, early language education should not focus just on phonological and phonic skills but on broader language skills.

Ostrosky, M. M., Mouzourou, C., Dorsey, E. A., Favazza, P. C., & Leboeuf, L. M. (2015). Pick a book, any book: Using children’s books to support positive attitudes toward peers with disabilities. Young Exceptional Children, 18(1), 30-43.
Children with disabilities tend to interact socially less than typically developing peers. Reading can help develop social skills. Representing children with disabilities in reading materials is very important for children with disabilities and their peers. Through book reading and discussion, librarians and other teachers can promote disability awareness leading to greater understand.

Shargorodsky, J., Curhan, S. G., Curhan, G. C., & Eavey, R. (2010). Change in prevalence of hearing loss in US adolescents. JAMA, 304(7), 772-778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1124
Hearing loss is a common sensory disorder, affecting tens of millions of individuals of all ages in the United States. In school-aged children, even slight hearing loss can create a need for speech therapy, auditory training, and special accommodations. Mild hearing loss in young children can impair speech and language development and lead to decreased educational achievement and impaired social-emotional development.

Saturday, December 31, 2016

Barriers to ed tech integration

A school's structure does matter in its ability to integrate education technology, according to a recent report. Researchers identify 19 building blocks that are key to ed tech and highlight how these elements are working in schools or school districts across the country.
EdSurge Research. (2016). How schools are changing. Burlingame, CA: EdSurge Research.
https://www.edsurge.com/research/special-reports/state-of-edtech-2016/buyers_and_users

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Ed tech research

2016 was a big year for high-quality research on the promise and peril of educational technology.   http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2016/12/ed-tech_research_2016.html?cmp=eml-enl-eu-news2-RM

As Maker Education has evolved, researchers have explored related equity issues, design principles for Maker spaces, and the impact of this approach on student learning. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2016/04/maker_movement_in_k-12_education_research.html
Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review (Winter).
Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research.
Martinez, S., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Constructing Modern Knowledge Press.
Sheridan, K., et al. (2016). Resourceful and inclusive: Towards design principles for makerspaces. Paper presented at AERA.
Stornaiuolo, A., & Nichols, P. (2016). Making publics: The iterative design of high school makerspaces. Paper presented at AERA.

A meta-analysis of 15 years' worth of research found 1-to-1 laptop programs had a positive impact on students' English, math, and science scores.
Zheng, B. (2016).  Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis, Review of Educational Research.

 Key studies on the comparability of computer- and paper-based assessments.http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2016/02/comparing_paper_computer_test_scores_research.html

 Students in online credit recovery fare worse than peers.
Heppen, J. (2016). Comparing the effectiveness of online and face-to-face credit recovery in algebra I. American Institutes for Research. http://www.air.org/resource/comparing-effectiveness-online-and-face-face-credit-recovery-algebra-i

Among young adults who regularly use smartphones and tablets, reading a story or performing a task on a screen instead of on paper led to greater focus on concrete details, but less ability to infer meaning or quickly get the gist of a problem, found a series of experiments.
Flanagan, M., & Kaufman, G. (2016). Lost in translation: Comparing the impact of an analog and digital version of a public health game on players' perceptions, attitudes, and cognitions. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 5(3), 1-9.
http://www.tiltfactor.org/wp-content/uploads2/Lost-in-Translation-Comparing-the-Impact-of-an-Analog-and-Digital-Version-of-a-Public-Health-Game-on-Players-Perceptions-Attitudes-and-Cognitions.pdf

Teachers' confidence in ed tech varies based on the type of school they work in, concluded a research  analysis. As a result, students in low-poverty and suburban schools may be getting more and better exposure to technology than their counterparts. 
Education Week Research Center. (2016). Teachers and Technology Use in the Classroom: Exclusive Survey Result. Education Week.
http://www.edweek.org/media/teachers-and-technology-use-in-the-classroom.pdf

Researchers investigating "affect-aware" computerized tutoring systems expressed confidence that systems capable of detecting student emotions could help change the direction of personalized learning. 
Education Week Research Center. (2016). Extending the Digital Reach: Schools Push Personalized Learning to New Heights. Education Week.
http://www.edweek.org/ew/collections/personalized-learning-report-2016/